Publication list with abstracts
of Dr. Michail Chertoprud (or Chertoprood in some
publications)
For articles only!
See Russian version for full texts and other
information!
Summary. The distribution of lithorheophil macrobenthos was studied in the range of scales from decimeter (regions in the scope of one stone) up to seven kilometers on the basis of 153 quantitative samples from oligosaprobic stream in Moscow region. Community shows significant spatial heterogeneity even at the small scale: life forms inhabit different sides of each stone and different sites of the riffle depending on current. At the scale of tens and hundreds of meters (between different riffles, within one stream) spatial heterogeneity of benthos is low, distribution of common species is independent from each other and riffs are similar by community structure. At the scope of kilometers heterogeneity increase and the alterations of community appear due to changes in stream size. Seasonal differences of benthos distribution are mentioned. The impact of various environmental factors on the distribution of lithorheophile macrobenthos is discussed.
Summary. The changes
in macrobenthos community depended on changes in stream discharge (from 0.001 m3/sec
to 100 m3/sec) were studied on the basis of data from 254 stations
of 180 streams located in the centre of European part of Russia. While
discharge of stream increases community composition changes considerably.
Species diversity increases from 12 to 47 species per station with the increase
in stream size. Moreover, the diversity of almost all groups, discerned
according habitat or trophic position and main taxonomic groups (with the
exception of Plecoptera and Diptera) increases with the increase in stream discharge.
The diversity of lithorheophilic species and species inhabiting soft substrates
is higher in small streams, whereas phitophilic species are more diverse in
large streams. With the increase in stream size the percent of algophagous and
filter feeders increases, percent of carnivorous remains the same and the
percent of detritophages decreases. The relative role of invertebrates macrotaxons
change with the stream size: in the smallest streams the diversity is the
highest among Diptera, Trichoptera and Plecoptera, in medium-size streams –
among Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera and Diptera, in large streams – in Ephemeroptera,
Gastropoda and Trichoptera. In some groups some species replace other
(close-related) in parallel with change in stream discharge however in general
this tendency is weak. The index of saprobic conditions increases with the
increase in stream size from 1.6-1.7 to 2.3-2.4. In small streams the saprobic
conditions are very different whereas large streams have tendency to be at β-mesosaprobic
level. Cluster analysis reveal four size classes of streams. Peculiarities of habitat
and macrobenthos fauna of these classes are described.
Summary.
Macrozoobenthos communities are described based on material from 70 springs and
spring brooks of the Moscow province. The communities include 587 taxa of
various origins: 27 rheophiles, 11 crenobionts, 10 ubiquists of small water
bodies, and 3 limnophiles. Rheophile species predominate in diversity (52%) and
total abundance (41.5%). Crenobionts include Beraea pullata, B. maura,
Crunoecia irrorata, Apatania zonella, Parachiona picicornis, Potamophylax
nigrocornis, Oxycera pseudoamoena, Î. ràrà, Î. pardalina, Pedicia rivosa, Thaumalea
testacea; six of
these are recorded in the region for the first time. Four types of spring
communities are recognized in the region according to the Braun-Blanquet
method: with predominant Rhyacophila fasciata and Baetis rhodani (macrorheocrenes),
Potamophylax nigroicornis (microrheocrenes), Nemurella pictetii (limnocrenes),
and Parachiona picicornis (helocrenes). Three of them are confined to
water bodies of different size and flow velocity; one (N. pictetii) is
linked to weakly flowing silted wated bodies. Change of spring communities is
often observed also downstream due to the distance from the opening of the
spring. The structure of rheocrene communities is most similar to that of
brooks that are significantly larger than the rheocrenes. Limnocrenes and
helocrenes communities have no counterparts among communities of other types of
water bodies. Some of the specific traits of spring communities fit the island
theory and can be explained by it. Comparison of the studied communities with
those of springs of Sweden and England reveals wide variance of the general
faunistic composition of the communities with a rather stable assortmeont of
troglobiot species.
Summary. The rithral and hypocrenal (of small rapid
streams) macrobenthos faunas of northern Greece, eastern Carpathians, montane
Crimea, and northwestern Caucasus are comparatively analyzed based on original
material. Peculiarities of the rheophile communities and faunas of each region
and of the whole studied area are described. The area is provisionally divided
into biogeographic unites based on rithral fauna; this classification is
essentially different from those of other authors. The main faunistic border
runs meridionally between Greece-Carpathians on one side and Caucasus-Crimea on
the other. The present authors believe that the biogeographic variability of
macrobenthos rithral faunas results from the position of regions containing
rithron communities and from spatial ties between them. Three fundamental
biogeographic zones, suggested to be ranked as subregions, are recognized in
the West Palearctic: the Balkan-Alpine (West European), the Scandinavian-Ural
(North European), and the Caucasian. All the data available fit the suggested
scheme, which shows that this approach is of universal value to biogeographic
analysis and to divisions of the rithral into biogeographic zones. The
local-scale variability of rheophile macrobenthos fauna in the northwestern
Caucasus is discussed. Significant faunistic similarity of territories
comprising the studied area is shown, internal division into biogeographic
zones is conducted, and the lowest scale border of the faunistic diversity of
rheophile macrobenthos is established at about 100-150 km.
Chertoprud M., 2007. The
Pantle-Back index modification for the european russia waterbodies // Bioindication
in monitoring of freshwater ecosystems. Book of papers of the International
Conference. St. Petersburg. LEMA. P. 298-302. (rus).
Summary. A new index is proposed for water quality assessment in European Russia inland waterbodies. The index is similar to the Pantle-Buck saprobity index, but is based on qualitative data and uses macrobenthic family level, with original list of its saprobity and indicator weight. Data collected in different East European waterbodies and watercourses are used to study the correlation of the new index with the waterbodies type, landscape zone, bottom substrat type and antropogenic load onto waters.
Chertoprud M., 2007. Structural variability of the
lithorheophile macrobenthos communities // Journal of General Biology (Rus). V. 68(6). P. 424-434.
Summary. The relationship between
the abundance of taxa and life forms of lithorheophile macrobenthos and its
variability were studied based on 200 quantitative samples from six territories
of the Palaearctic (Moscow province, northwestern Caucasus, eastern
Carpathians, northern Karelia, South Urals, and Altai mountains). The set of
taxa predominant in the communities and their ecology are described. It is
found that community structure varies strongly, depending on the
characteristics of each region, on the size of the watercourse, and on the
season. Six types of biocenoses are recognized by means of the Braun-Blanquet
method, each characterized by its peculiar set of predominant life forms and
families rather similar in different territories. The differences between these
types are related to the size and the hydrological conditions of the
watercourse. Biocenosis 1 is typical to smal brooks (up to 0.01-0.1 m3/s),
characterised by the predominance of detritophagous animals non-specific to the
type of food (Gammarus, Nemoura, Limnephilidae). In biocenosis 2a
(large brooks with water flow 0.03-0.3 m3/s and velocity 0.1-0.3
m/s), almost immobile shell scrapers (Ancylus, Silo, Agapetes, Glossosoma) are
predominant. Biocenosis 2b (large brooks with velocity 0.3-0.5 m/s) have a more
or less balanced set of fundamental lithorheophile life forms. Biocenosis 2c
(large mountain brooks with velocity 0.5-1 m/s) is characterised by specialized
scrapers of the rapids (Epeorus and Diamesa) and filterers
(Simuliidae). In biocenosis 3 (small rivers), sedentary filterers (Hydropsychidae,
Simulliidae) are predominant; scrapers also play a significant role. Biocenosis
4 (rivers with water flow more than 3 m3/s, thick incrustations, and
silted stones on the bottom) has predominant filterers (Hydropsychidae) and
vermiform algophagous animals inside the incrustations (Orthocladius,
Psychomyia). Significant variability in community structure unrelated to the
environmental factors is revealed within each of the biocenotic types. It is
concluded that the quantitative structure of lithorheophile communities cannot
be reliably predicted at the present level of knowledge, and the extrapolation
of data is possible only at the level of species composition and ranked
distribution of abundance.
Marine & estuarine investigations
Azovsky A., Chertoprood
M., 1998. Scale-oriented approach to the analysis of spatial structure of
communities // Journal of General Biology (Rus). V. 59(2). P. 117-136.
Summary. Basic types of spatial structure of communities are briefly
reviewed, and some problems of the real structures examination are discussed.
We propose a new – fractal – type of a spatial structure as a hierarchical system
of several levels of enclosed patches with similar contrast on each level. New
statistical criterion is offered for distinction of known types of a structure,
including fractal one. The criterion is based on relation of heterogeneity of
community structure with spatial scale of consideration. This criterion occurs
to be rather effective on simple models simulating various types of
distribution, though it has some limitation. Some notion of spatial scaling are
specified. Perspectives of the scale-approach to the analysis of spatial
structures and some difficulties of its practical use are discussed.
Chertoprood M., Azovsky A., 2000. MULTISCALE
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MACROBENTHOS OF THE WHITE SEA TIDAL ZONE // Journal of General
Biology (Rus). V. 61(1). P. 47-63.
Summary. Spatial distribution of macrobenthos of
middle intertidal zone was studied in scales from centimeters to 30 kilometers
along the coastline. The community structure and distribution of 5 most
abundant species (Hydrobia ulvae, Mya arenaria, Macoma baltica, Peloscolex
benedeni, Arenicola marina) were considered. Spatial heterogeneity of macrobenthos,
estimated as mean dissimilarity between samples, kept constant in scales of
centimeters-meters, but increased significantly when enlarged area is
considered. Patterns of many species changed with scale from random mosaics to
more or less pronounced patchiness, whereas the density of H.ulvae and
structure of the whole community demonstrated fractal (self-similar) patch
pattern in wide range of scale from dozens of meters to several kilometers.
Spatial correlations between species (the composition of assembladges) and
between species and environmental factors were also scale dependent. Some
possible effects of scale on the observed spatial distribution of benthos are
discussed, and multiscaled analysis of biotic heterogeneity is concluded to be
very fruitful.
Azovsky A., Chertoprood M., Kucheruk N., Rybnikov P.,
Sapozhnikov F., 2000. Fractal properties of spatial distribution of intertidal
benthic communities // Marine Biology. V. 136(3). P. 581-590.
Summary.
We studied the spatial distribution of intertidal
macrozoobenthos, microphytobenthos (diatom algae) and sediments at scales from
decimeters to kilometers using an index of spatial homogeneity, DI.
Sediments were found to be randomly distributed, making up a mosaic of silty
and sandy sites. On the contrary, the estimated spatial variability of macrofauna
within all the scales up to 5500 m depended upon neither extent (total area
covered) nor grain (finest spatial resolution) but only their ratio. We treat
this as evidence of statistical self-similarity (fractal property) of the
pattern. For diatoms, spatial heterogeneity of community structure was also
self-similar in the range from 0.25 to 75 m (within a single bight). At larger
scales, microalgae showed a combination of patchy structure with pronounced
gradient along the shoreline from brackish-water to marine flora. Thus, fractal
properties of both groups became manifested at scales corresponding to their
mean body size. The ranges of fractal patterns were approximately equal to 103-105
if measured in body size units. We suggest that fractal-like spatial structures
may be a general feature of communities, and speculate on the nature of such
patterns.
Chertoprood
M., Udalov A., Stoljarov A., Borisov R., 2004. Diversity of Macrobenthic Communities in the White Sea
Estuaries // Oceanology (Rus). V.44(6). P. 901-911.
Summary. Diversity of
intertidal and upper-subtidal macrozoobenthic communities was described on the
base of 11 estuaries of small rivers and streams in the Kandalaksha Bay of the
White Sea. Using the Braun-Blanke and claster-analysis technique, the nine
types of macrobenthic communities were classified. Community type mostly depends
on an estuary size, salinity, substrate type, water velocity and depth. A
zonation of macrobenthic communities along a main estuarine axis exists in
large estuaries with a pronounced salinity gradient only and is described in
detail within the Chernaya River estuary. Such zonation is fully absent in
small stream estuaries with polypoikilogalinic conditions, where the
poor-species assemblage of brakish-water amphipods Gammarus zaddachi and G.
duebeni prevails. The freshwater species of river and lake
origin (especially Diptera and Trichoptera larva) are the dominant group in
the small-estuarine fauna. On the contrary, the importance of freshwater
species in the density and biomass of estuarine assemblages is insignificant.
Chertoprud
E., Chertoprud M., Kondar D., Kornev P., Udalov A., 2006. Harpacticoida Taxocens
Diversity on the Silt-Sand Littoral of Kandalaksha Bay (the White Sea) //
Oceanology (rus). V. 46(4). P. 10-19.
Summary. The fauna composition, ecological groups, and life forms of
harpacticoids from 15 soft bottom littoral sites of the White Sea (Karelian
coast, Kandalaksha Bay) were studied. Six types of harpacticoids taxocens with
different complex of dominated species are described on the basis of this
material. Taxocenon of the desalted silt sands is represented by Stenchelia
palustris; the medium grained sands by Heterolaophonte minuta, Paraleptastacus
kliei – Huntemannia jadensis, Amphiascoides nanus – Scottopsyllus
minor; coarse sands by Ameira parvula, and Ameira scotti – Mesochra
lilljeborgi. The variety between these groups is partly explained by the
difference in granulometric composition and salinity in different sites. Besides,
groups of different taxocens from the same type of sediments in different sites
of Kandalaksha Bay were found.
Chertoprud
E., Chertoprud M., Garlitskaya L., Azovsky A., Kondar D., 2007. SPATIAL VARIABILITY OF
HARPACTICOIDA (COPEPODA) TAXOCEN STRUCTURE IN THE INTERTIDAL AND SUBLITORAL
ZONES OF THE EUROPEAN SEAS // Oceanology (rus). V. 47(1). P. 1-10.
Summary.
We discribe the structure
of benthic Harpacticoida assemblages on the basis of 26 original and literature
stations in nine seas around Europe. All species of Harpacticoida were divided
into six living forms, which composition is constant in all seas and independent
of species composition. The Harpacticoida assemblages in different seas are
similar. They are usually formed by different species, but close genera,
families and living forms. The intraregional and biotopical variability of the
structures of Harpacticoida assemblages are often more stable than its
interregional (geographical) variability. The main determining factors of the
Harpacticoida community structure are the local biotopical factors: the bottom
substrate parameters and hydrodynamic processes.